For GRC Teams
Where your audit trail actually breaks.
Most GRC teams find out their evidence coverage has gaps at the worst possible moment — when an external auditor tests it.
The Problem
Having a policy isn’t the same as proving it was followed.
A written policy tells an auditor what's supposed to happen. It doesn't tell them what actually happened. That gap — between documented intent and demonstrable practice — is where most audit findings live, and it's usually invisible until someone outside your organization goes looking for it.
What We Actually Examine
Control-by-control, not policy-by-policy.
- Evidence mapping. For every control you claim, we check whether the evidence actually exists — and whether it would hold up under external scrutiny.
- Process vs. paper. We compare what your documentation says happens against what your systems and people actually do, day to day.
- Gap prioritization. Not every gap is equal. We tell you which ones are cosmetic and which ones would fail a real certification audit.
- Audit-readiness, not just compliance. There's a real difference between "technically compliant" and "ready to be audited." We build for the second one.
What You Walk Away With
A gap report you can actually act on.
Not a generic checklist. A prioritized, control-by-control report showing exactly where your evidence is solid, where it's thin, and what specifically needs to change before a real certification audit — so nothing you find out during our assessment gets discovered again by someone else, later, when it costs more to fix.
Start with a Pre-Assessment.
Understand exactly where your audit trail stands before committing to anything.
Book a Workflow Foundation Audit